Best IPX 4 vs 5: A Comprehensive Comparison
So, talking about smartphone water-resistance, IPX 4 and IPX 5 are pretty notable names out there. As someone who loves tech and has worked in this sector for a while, people often come to me asking what's the deal with IPX 4 and IPX 5. So, in this article, I'm gonna dive into the top five questions people ask about these two ratings, and I'll throw in my personal opinion too.
Number one: What's this IPX 4 all about?
Number two: Now, what's this IPX 5 thing?
Number three: Now, how do these IPX 4 and IPX 5 things stack up in real life?
Number four: What are the downsides to these ratings, right?
5. Can a device with IPX 4 or IPX 5 rating be used underwater?
IPX 4 rating is similar to 'waterproof'. It indicates that your device can withstand water exposure from all directions. Thus, if your phone falls into a puddle or gets splashed when you're in the shower, it should continue functioning.
However, the rule is that water should not actually enter the phone. It is quite common on low-cost phones and offers an attractive feature for those looking for some level of water resistance without spending a lot of money.
So, IPX 5 rating is a more significant rating. It indicates that your device can endure low-pressure water sprays from all directions. This feature is often included in more premium smartphones.
It suggests that if you inadvertently drop your phone in a brook or if it's exposed to a water spray, it should still be safe. Just remember, although it's IPX-5 rating, it's not completely waterproof. But if you place it in water or it gets hit with strong water jet, there could still be a risk.
Okay, let's get down to it. The big key distinction is just how well they cope with moisture. Both protect against splashes and light sprays, but IPX-5 rating is way better at it.
If you live somewhere where you're always around water—like, near the beach or in a place with frequent rain—then an IPX-5 rating smartphone might be the best choice. But for most people, IPX 4 is quite good, you know?
Waterproofing capability is great, but there are a few negatives. First off, phones with better Waterproofing capability often cost a bit higher.
And they usually have a complex design, which might lead to battery issues or not performing as well as usual after a while. You gotta consider the good and the bad before you decide if spending on one is worth it.
No, devices rated IPX 4 or IPX 5 are not water-resistant and should not be used underwater. If you're going to use your phone underwater for pool activities or scuba diving, you need a more suitable option—like IPX 8 or IPX 9 ratings.
- Fatal mistakes in IPX9K waterproof test: nozzle size and water temperature control, the truth you must know
- What are the key differences between ISO 80369-7 and ISO 594?
- KINGPO Company Unveils Next-Generation Electrosurgery Analyzer
- ISO 594 is replaced with ISO 80369
- KingPo CEO invited to the 83rd International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) General Assembly
- ISO 80369-7:2016 Connectors with 6% (Luer) taper for intravascular or hypodermic applications What is the ISO 80369-7 standard? What happened to ISO 594-1 and ISO 594-2?
- ISO 80369-3 Test Equipment LIst
- Medical Device Pressure Validation: Ensuring Accuracy and Reliability
- Luer Gauge Adapter for Syringes: Enhancing Medical Precision and Safety
- Fluid Flow Rate Measurement Devices: A Comprehensive Overview